Impact Of Artificial Intelligence On Society

Below is a great article about the history of AI philosophy. To learn even more about the philosophy of AI check out this site:

https://AIphilosophers.com

Parallel distributed and symbol-processing approaches. viii. Neural Networks and Connectionism Charles Babbage recognized (circa 1836) that the punched cards may restrain operations on symbols as easily as on silk; the cards may encode numerals along with other symbolic data and, more importantly, instructions, such as conditionally branching instructions, for numeric and other symbolic operations. Augusta Ada Lovelace (Babbage's software engineer) grasped the import of these innovations: "The boundaries of arithmetic" she writes, "were... outstepped the moment the concept of employing the [education ] cards had occurred" thus "enabling mechanism to combine together with general symbols, in successions of infinite variety and scope" (Lovelace 1842). "Babbage," Turing notes," had all the essential thoughts" (Turing 1950). Babbage's Engine -- had constructed it in most of its steam driven cog-wheel driven glory -- would have been a programmable all-purpose device, the first digital computer.

  1. Feedback from experience and exhibit a lot of other literary cognitive characteristics vi. Knowledge Representation (KR) Computer: intends to fool the questioner. (B) Human: aims to help the questioner

While we do not understand what thought or intellect is, basically, a. Computers vii. 2. What is called "believing" in us is paradigmatic for that which thought is, the question of how individual level intelligence may arise afresh in the foundations. Do insects think in any way?

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/do-insects-have-consciousness-ego-180958824/

And should insects... what of "bacteria level intelligence" (Brooks 1991a)? Much "water flowing downhill," it sounds," tries to get to the base of the hill by ingeniously seeking the point of least resistance" (Searle 1989). Don't we need to draw the line somewhere? Maybe seeming intelligence -- to actually be intelligence -- has to come up to some threshold level.

Information acquisition because of expertise underwrites human common sense, and one may doubt whether any preformed ontology could impart common sense in complete human measure. Besides, whatever the other intellectual skills a thing might manifest (or appear to), at however high a level, without learning capacity, it would still seem to be sadly lacking something essential to human-level intellect and maybe intelligence of any sort. The chance of machine learning is indicated in computer applications' skills to self-modify and different means of realizing that skill last to be developed. Such techniques have found a number of programs from sport programs whose play improves with experience to information mining (discovering patterns and regularities in bodies of data).

The start. Samuel's (1959) checkers (or even "draughts") program was noteworthy for incorporating mechanisms enabling it to learn from experience well enough to finally to outplay Samuel himself. Additionally, in establishing one version of this program to perform with a slightly altered version, carrying more than the configurations of the stronger player to the next generation, and replicating the procedure -- allowing stronger and stronger versions to evolve -- Samuel pioneered the use of what have come to be known as "genetic algorithms" and "evolutionary" calculating. Chess has also inspired notable attempts culminating, in 1997, at the famous success of Deep Blue over defending world champion Gary Kasparov in a widely publicized series of games (recounted in Hsu 2002). Though a few at AI disparaged Deep Blue's reliance on "brute force" application of computer power instead of enhanced search guiding heuristics, we might still add chess into checkers (in which the reigning "human-machine machine winner" since 1994 has been CHINOOK( the machine), and backgammon, as games which computers today play at or above the greatest human degrees. Computers also play fair to middling bridge, and Move -- though not at the highest human level. Furthermore, intelligent agents or "softbots" are elements or participants in many different electronic games.

Of larger expressions (for example, sentences) are built up from the meanings i. Low-Level Appearances and Attributions Here, drawing on Aristotle, medieval tribe distinguished between the "passive intelligence" wherein the spirit is affected, and the "active intellect" wherein the soul forms conceptions, draws inferences, makes judgments, and otherwise acts. Orthodoxy identified the soul proper (the immortal part) together with the active rational element. Unfortunately, disagreement over how these two (qualitative-experiential and cognitive-intentional) factors relate is as rife as disagreement over what things believe; and these disagreements are linked. Those who dismiss the appearing intelligence of computers since computers lack feelings appear to hold qualia to be required for intentionality. People like Descartes, who dismiss the appearing sentience of nonhuman animals because he thought animals do not think, apparently maintain intentionality to be necessary for qualia. Others deny both necessities, maintaining the chance of cognition absent qualia (as Christian orthodoxy, perhaps, would have the thought-processes of God, angels, and the saints in paradise to be), or even keeping up the possibility of feeling absent cognition (as Aristotle grants the lower creatures).